Atkins v. State
481 So. 2d 1300, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6035
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 28, 1986
DocketNo. 86-68
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 481 So. 2d 1300 (Atkins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Atkins v. State, 481 So. 2d 1300, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6035 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).
Opinion
The trial judge’s disposition of the defendant’s Rule 3.850 motion is a model that is too rarely seen: he has attached to his order denying relief the plea agreement and plea colloquy which, taken together, conclusively show that the defendant’s claim that he was promised six years imprisonment and received twenty-two years instead is totally without merit.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Sundale Associates, Ltd. v. Moore
481 So. 2d 1300 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
481 So. 2d 1300, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6035, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atkins-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.