Sunbelt Rentals, Inc. v. New York Renaissance

126 A.D.3d 481, 7 N.Y.S.3d 18
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 12, 2015
Docket14473 152106/12
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 126 A.D.3d 481 (Sunbelt Rentals, Inc. v. New York Renaissance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sunbelt Rentals, Inc. v. New York Renaissance, 126 A.D.3d 481, 7 N.Y.S.3d 18 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol R. Edmead, J.), entered December 19, 2013, which denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on its claims for breach of contract, quantum meruit, and account stated against defendant New York Renaissance (NYR), and on its claims to enforce personal guaranties against defendants Joshua Dolan and Dan Pirvulescu, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff alleges that NYR breached a contract for rental of equipment and services, and failed to pay invoices addressed to it in the total amount of $36,148.78. Defendant NYR denies that it was a party to any agreement with plaintiff, and asserts that a related company, now in bankruptcy, rented the equipment.

Plaintiff failed to make a prima facie showing of a binding agreement with NYR (Allied Sheet Metal Works v Kerby Saunders, Inc., 206 AD2d 166, 169 [1st Dept 1994]; see also Harris v Seward Park Hous. Corp., 79 AD3d 425, 426 [1st Dept 2010]). The documents submitted by plaintiff do not show an agreement with NYR, nor does plaintiff allege any definite terms of an agreement (see Allied Sheet Metal Works, 206 AD2d at 169-170).

Plaintiff failed to sufficiently address on appeal its claims for quantum meruit and account stated, and we decline to consider those claims.

The court correctly denied summary judgment on plaintiffs personal guaranty claims against Dolan and Pirvulescu, as plaintiff failed to show that any underlying debt is actually *482 owed by NYR (see Davimos v Halle, 35 AD3d 270, 272 [1st Dept 2006]).

Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Richter, ManzanetDaniels and Kapnick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clean Earth of North Jersey, Inc. v. Northcoast Maintenance Corp.
142 A.D.3d 1032 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Ochoa v. Montgomery
132 A.D.3d 827 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 A.D.3d 481, 7 N.Y.S.3d 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sunbelt-rentals-inc-v-new-york-renaissance-nyappdiv-2015.