Sun Lumber Co. v. Bradfield

California Court of Appeal

Sun Lumber Co. v. Bradfield

122 Cal. App. 783

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedApril 7, 1932

DocketCiv. No. 8242

StatusPublished

This text of 122 Cal. App. 783 (Sun Lumber Co. v. Bradfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sun Lumber Co. v. Bradfield, 122 Cal. App. 783 (Cal. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

SPENCE, J.

In this action to quiet title the trial court entered its decree quieting the title of plaintiff and appellant against defendants with the exception of respondents herein and as to said respondents it decreed that they had a valid mechanic’s lien upon the premises which was prior to the claim of said appellant. This appeal is taken on the judgment-roll.

The property here involved is known as lots 16 and 17 in tract 3131 as per map thereof recorded in the records of Los Angeles County. The facts herein present precisely the same questions as those presented on the appeal in Sun Lumber Co. v. Bradfield et al., (No. 8241) ante, p. 391 [784]*784[10 Pac. (2d) 183]. The opinion in said last-named appeal has been this day filed and for the reasons therein stated the decree herein is affirmed.

Nourse, P. J., and Sturtevant, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SPENCE, J.

In this action to quiet title the trial court entered its decree quieting the title of plaintiff and appellant against defendants with the exception of respondents herein and as to said respondents it decreed that they had a valid mechanic’s lien upon the premises which was prior to the claim of said appellant. This appeal is taken on the judgment-roll.

The property here involved is known as lots 16 and 17 in tract 3131 as per map thereof recorded in the records of Los Angeles County. The facts herein present precisely the same questions as those presented on the appeal in Sun Lumber Co. v. Bradfield et al., (No. 8241) ante, p. 391 [784]*784[10 Pac. (2d) 183]. The opinion in said last-named appeal has been this day filed and for the reasons therein stated the decree herein is affirmed.

Nourse, P. J., and Sturtevant, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

122 Cal. App. 783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sun-lumber-co-v-bradfield-calctapp-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack