Sun First National Bank of Orlando v. Santarsiero
This text of 401 So. 2d 946 (Sun First National Bank of Orlando v. Santarsiero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant appeals from an order extending the time within which appellee might file an independent action on her claim against the estate. The personal representative had filed an objection to the claim.
The court found that good cause, as provided in the statute, had been shown. The hearing on the petition was not transcribed and no record reflecting the evidentiary basis for the court’s finding has been presented for review.
The lower court’s ruling comes to us clothed with a presumption of correctness. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1980). Without a record to demonstrate an abuse of discretion by the trial court, we must assume that facts were presented which support the decision.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
401 So. 2d 946, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sun-first-national-bank-of-orlando-v-santarsiero-fladistctapp-1981.