Phillips v. State

Florida Circuit Courts

Phillips v. State

45 Fla. Supp. 2d 57

CourtCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida

DecidedJanuary 11, 1991

DocketCase No. 90-008 AC A02 (Lower Court Case No. 89-138332 TI A08)

StatusPublished

This text of 45 Fla. Supp. 2d 57 (Phillips v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Phillips v. State, 45 Fla. Supp. 2d 57 (Fla. Super. Ct. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

COLBATH, J.

The Appellant, Defendant below, appeals the trial court’s finding him guilty of speeding.

The record on appeal contains neither a transcript nor a narrative report of the trial court’s proceedings. A lower court’s ruling comes to an appellate court clothed with a presumption of correctness, and without a record to demonstrate an abuse of discretion of the trial court, an appellate court must affirm. Sun First National Bank of Orlando v Santarsiero, 401 So.2d 946 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981) and Pence v Ennis, 163 So.2d 330 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964). Accordingly, this Court has no choice but to affirm.

[58]*58The facts as presented to this Court by the Appellant’s Initial Brief are disturbing to the extent that this Court suspects that the officer did indeed arrest the wrong person. Case law, however, is legion that appellate courts may not substitute its judgment for that of the trial court.

Accordingly, and for the reasons and authority set forth above, the judgment of the trial court is hereby affirmed. MOUNTS, WENNET, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

COLBATH, J.

The Appellant, Defendant below, appeals the trial court’s finding him guilty of speeding.

The record on appeal contains neither a transcript nor a narrative report of the trial court’s proceedings. A lower court’s ruling comes to an appellate court clothed with a presumption of correctness, and without a record to demonstrate an abuse of discretion of the trial court, an appellate court must affirm. Sun First National Bank of Orlando v Santarsiero, 401 So.2d 946 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981) and Pence v Ennis, 163 So.2d 330 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964). Accordingly, this Court has no choice but to affirm.

[58]*58The facts as presented to this Court by the Appellant’s Initial Brief are disturbing to the extent that this Court suspects that the officer did indeed arrest the wrong person. Case law, however, is legion that appellate courts may not substitute its judgment for that of the trial court.

Accordingly, and for the reasons and authority set forth above, the judgment of the trial court is hereby affirmed. MOUNTS, WENNET, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 Fla. Supp. 2d 57, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-v-state-flacirct-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack