Sun Bank of Riverside v. Taines
This text of 425 So. 2d 646 (Sun Bank of Riverside v. Taines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The summary final judgments in favor of the defendants are reversed since there were material issues of fact remaining as to whether the renewal of the guaranty obligation sued upon was executed contemporaneously with the further extension of credit to the primary obligor. Jones v. McConnon & Co., 100 Fla. 1158, 130 So. 760 (1930); Gordon v. Corporate Insurance Services, Inc., 374 So.2d 603 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). Cf. Brandon v. Pittman, 117 Fla. 678, 158 So. 443 (1934); Gibbs v. American National Bank of Jacksonville, 155 So.2d 651 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963), cert. discharged, 170 So.2d 821 (Fla.1964).
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
425 So. 2d 646, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27749, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sun-bank-of-riverside-v-taines-fladistctapp-1983.