Sun Bank of Riverside v. Taines

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sun Bank of Riverside v. Taines

425 So. 2d 646, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27749

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 25, 1983·No. Nos. 82-640, 82-1079·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The summary final judgments in favor of the defendants are reversed since there were material issues of fact remaining as to whether the renewal of the guaranty obligation sued upon was executed contemporaneously with the further extension of credit to the primary obligor. Jones v. McConnon & Co., 100 Fla. 1158, 130 So. 760 (1930); Gordon v. Corporate Insurance Services, Inc., 374 So.2d 603 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). Cf. Brandon v. Pittman, 117 Fla. 678, 158 So. 443 (1934); Gibbs v. American National Bank of Jacksonville, 155 So.2d 651 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963), cert. discharged, 170 So.2d 821 (Fla.1964).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The summary final judgments in favor of the defendants are reversed since there were material issues of fact remaining as to whether the renewal of the guaranty obligation sued upon was executed contemporaneously with the further extension of credit to the primary obligor. Jones v. McConnon & Co., 100 Fla. 1158, 130 So. 760 (1930); Gordon v. Corporate Insurance Services, Inc., 374 So.2d 603 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). Cf. Brandon v. Pittman, 117 Fla. 678, 158 So. 443 (1934); Gibbs v. American National Bank of Jacksonville, 155 So.2d 651 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963), cert. discharged, 170 So.2d 821 (Fla.1964).

Reversed and remanded.

Sun Bank of Riverside v. Taines, 425 So. 2d 646, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27749 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

425 So. 2d 646 (Sun Bank of Riverside v. Taines) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related