Gibbs v. American National Bank of Jacksonville
170 So. 2d 821, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2298
Opinion
We initially felt that prima facie jurisdiction was suggested by the petition for a writ of certiorari. We have now heard the matter on both jurisdiction and merits. After oral arguments and a thorough con[822]*822sideration of the record and briefs we have concluded that there is no jurisdictional conflict between the decision under review and prior decisions of this Court or other Districts Courts of Appeal. The writ is therefore discharged, Fla.App., 155 So.2d 651.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gibbs v. American National Bank of Jacksonville, 170 So. 2d 821, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2298 (Fla. 1964).
170 So. 2d 821 (Gibbs v. American National Bank of Jacksonville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Texaco, Inc. v. Giltak Corp.
492 So. 2d 812 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Sun Bank of Riverside v. Taines
425 So. 2d 646 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Gillespie v. DeWitt
280 S.E.2d 736 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1981)
Independent Fire Ins. Co. v. Horn
343 So. 2d 862 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Waller v. Missouri City State Bank
482 S.W.2d 40 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1972)