Sumpter v. Blake

249 S.W.3d 924, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 520, 2008 WL 1721878
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 15, 2008
DocketED 90621
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 249 S.W.3d 924 (Sumpter v. Blake) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sumpter v. Blake, 249 S.W.3d 924, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 520, 2008 WL 1721878 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

PATRICIA L. COHEN, Chief Judge.

Timmy Sumpter appeals from a judgment denying his petition for writ of habe-as corpus. The appeal is dismissed.

If this Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain an appeal, then it should be dismissed. Buff v. Roper, 155 S.W.3d 811, 812 (Mo.App. E.D.2005). Appellant seeks to appeal from the circuit court’s judgment dismissing his petition for writ of habeas corpus. An appeal does not lie from the denial or dismissal of a petition for habeas corpus. Blackmon v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, 97 S.W.3d 458 (Mo. banc 2003); Garner v. Roper, 224 S.W.3d 623 (Mo.App. E.D.2007).

We issued an order directing Appellant to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed. Appellant filed a response asking this Court to address the merits of his appeal. However, if this Court does not have jurisdiction, then it cannot address the merits of the appeal. Appellant’s remedy, if any, is where a petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied is to file a new writ petition in a higher court. Webster v. Purkett, 110 S.W.3d 832, 837 (Mo.App. E.D.2003). We decline to treat his appeal as an extraordinary writ petition.

The appeal is dismissed for lack of an appealable judgment.

BOOKER T. SHAW and NANNETTE A. BAKER, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Butler v. State
249 S.W.3d 924 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
249 S.W.3d 924, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 520, 2008 WL 1721878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sumpter-v-blake-moctapp-2008.