Garner v. Roper
This text of 224 S.W.3d 623 (Garner v. Roper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant Billy B. Garner appeals from a judgment denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus. The appeal is dismissed.
Appellant seeks to appeal from the circuit court’s judgment denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus. An appeal does not lie from the denial of a petition for habeas corpus. Blackmon v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, 97 S.W.3d 458 (Mo. banc 2003); Waser man v. Purkett, 169 S.W.3d 151 (Mo.App. E.D.2005). 1 If we lack jurisdiction to entertain an appeal, then it should be dismissed. Buff v. Roper, 155 S.W.3d 811, 812 (Mo.App. E.D.2005). This Court issued an order directing Appellant to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed. Appellant has filed a response addressing the merits of his appeal and offers no authority concerning this Court’s jurisdiction to entertain his appeal.
The appeal is dismissed for lack of an appealable judgment.
. A petitioner's remedy where a petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied is to file a new writ petition in a higher court. Webster v. Purkett, 110 S.W.3d 832, 837 (Mo.App. E.D.2003).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
224 S.W.3d 623, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 751, 2007 WL 1412411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garner-v-roper-moctapp-2007.