Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Sumners v. State

Sumners v. State

224 S.E.2d 126, 137 Ga. App. 493, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 2504
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 4, 1976
Docket51666
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 224 S.E.2d 126 (Sumners v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sumners v. State, 224 S.E.2d 126, 137 Ga. App. 493, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 2504 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

Quillian, Judge.

The defendant, appellant here, was indicted, tried and convicted for violation of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act (2 counts). Appeal was taken from his sentence to four years on each count to be served concurrently.

The sole enumeration of error recites: "The Court *494 below erred in granting Appellee’s Motion for a directed verdict.” The trial judge did not grant appellee’s motion for a directed verdict for no such motion was made, neither did the defendant move for a directed verdict in his favor. Furthermore, the argument addressed to this court concerns an objection made to testimony by a state’s witness concerning alleged contraband which was not in court. Counsel for the defendant objected to the absence of such evidence on the ground that the contraband was the highest and best evidence and was required to be produced in court. The objection was overruled.

Submitted January 15, 1976 Decided February 4, 1976. Bobby G. Beasley, for appellant. Richard E. Allen, District Attorney, Stephen E. Curry, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

One can not urge a ground different from that enumerated as error and totally fail to argue the ground so enumerated. Wall v. Rhodes, 112 Ga. App. 572 (1) (145 SE2d 756); Pinyan v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 113 Ga. App. 130, 133 (147 SE2d 452); Slaughter v. Linder, 122 Ga. App. 144, 148 (176 SE2d 450); Cross v. Miller, 221 Ga. 579, 582 (146 SE2d 279). Moreover, as we observed in Willingham v. State, 134 Ga. App. 603, 606 (215 SE2d 521): "The term 'best evidence rule’ is misleading. This is really a preferential rule giving first preference to the original writing. . . The rule has nothing to do with evidence generally, but is restricted to writings alone. The Georgia statute states: 'The best evidence which exists of the fact sought to be proved shall be produced, unless its absence shall be satisfactorily accounted for.’ This statute has been clearly construed to apply only where the contents of a writing are in issue. Where the existence of a fact is the question at issue and not the contents of a writing, then oral and written evidence of the fact may both be primary evidence.”

No reversible ground appearing, the judgment below must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Deen, P. J., and Webb, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clark v. State
348 S.E.2d 916 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1986)
Sims v. State
303 S.E.2d 60 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)
Anderson v. State
303 S.E.2d 57 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)
Galloway v. State
301 S.E.2d 894 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)
Ingram v. State
287 S.E.2d 304 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1981)
Jim Walter Corp. v. Ward
258 S.E.2d 159 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1979)
Smith v. State
249 S.E.2d 353 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)
Wilson v. State
244 S.E.2d 355 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)
Megar v. State
241 S.E.2d 447 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)
Redwing Carriers, Inc. v. Knight
239 S.E.2d 686 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)
Adams v. State
235 S.E.2d 667 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)
Inn of Dalton, Inc. v. Hill
233 S.E.2d 275 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)
Springer v. State
230 S.E.2d 883 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
224 S.E.2d 126, 137 Ga. App. 493, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 2504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sumners-v-state-gactapp-1976.