Ingram v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Ingram v. State

285 S.E.2d 82, 159 Ga. App. 726, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2730

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 28, 1981

Docket62115

StatusPublished

This text of 285 S.E.2d 82 (Ingram v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ingram v. State, 285 S.E.2d 82, 159 Ga. App. 726, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2730 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

Sognier, Judge.

Patricia Ingram was convicted of wrongful possession of controlled substances. She contends the trial court erred by denying her motion for a directed verdict at the conclusion of the state’s evidence, and by denying her motion for a new trial. Both motions were based on a lack of proof by the state. We have examined the entire transcript and find the evidence established conclusively appellant’s guilt of the offenses charged. Further, we find that a rational trier of fact could find from the evidence adduced at trial proof of appellant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Baldwin v. State, 153 Ga. App. 35, 37 (264 SE2d 528) (1980). Accordingly, the enumerations of error are without merit.

Judgment affirmed.

Shulman, P. J., and Birdsong, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sognier, Judge.

Patricia Ingram was convicted of wrongful possession of controlled substances. She contends the trial court erred by denying her motion for a directed verdict at the conclusion of the state’s evidence, and by denying her motion for a new trial. Both motions were based on a lack of proof by the state. We have examined the entire transcript and find the evidence established conclusively appellant’s guilt of the offenses charged. Further, we find that a rational trier of fact could find from the evidence adduced at trial proof of appellant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Baldwin v. State, 153 Ga. App. 35, 37 (264 SE2d 528) (1980). Accordingly, the enumerations of error are without merit.

Judgment affirmed.

Shulman, P. J., and Birdsong, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

285 S.E.2d 82, 159 Ga. App. 726, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ingram-v-state-gactapp-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack