Sumner v. Osborne

101 Fla. 742
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 29, 1931
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 101 Fla. 742 (Sumner v. Osborne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sumner v. Osborne, 101 Fla. 742 (Fla. 1931).

Opinion

Per Curcium.

The record in this cause having been considered by the court, and the foregoing opinion prepared under Chapter 14553, Acts of 1929, adopted by the Court as its opinion, it is considered, ordered, and decreed by the Court that the decree of the court below should be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.,

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur. Brown, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sheridan, Et Vir v. Respess
3 So. 2d 704 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1941)
Liverpool London Globe Ins. Co., Ltd. v. Orrell
190 So. 552 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1939)
Walter J. Dolan Properties, Inc. v. Vonnegut
183 So. 740 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)
Matthews v. McCain
170 So. 323 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)
Stanley v. Powers
169 So. 861 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)
Kerman's v. Strobhar
143 So. 138 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 Fla. 742, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sumner-v-osborne-fla-1931.