Sumner v. Osborne

101 Fla. 742
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided May 29, 1931·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curcium.

The record in this cause having been considered by the court, and the foregoing opinion prepared under Chapter 14553, Acts of 1929, adopted by the Court as its opinion, it is considered, ordered, and decreed by the Court that the decree of the court below should be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.,

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur. Brown, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sumner v. Osborne, 101 Fla. 742 (Fla. 1931).

101 Fla. 742 (Sumner v. Osborne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sheridan, Et Vir v. Respess
3 So. 2d 704 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1941)
Liverpool London Globe Ins. Co., Ltd. v. Orrell
190 So. 552 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1939)
Walter J. Dolan Properties, Inc. v. Vonnegut
183 So. 740 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)
Matthews v. McCain
170 So. 323 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)
Stanley v. Powers
169 So. 861 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)
Kerman's v. Strobhar
143 So. 138 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)