Summerall v. State

294 S.E.2d 344, 278 S.C. 255, 1982 S.C. LEXIS 412
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedAugust 9, 1982
Docket21773
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 294 S.E.2d 344 (Summerall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Summerall v. State, 294 S.E.2d 344, 278 S.C. 255, 1982 S.C. LEXIS 412 (S.C. 1982).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Appellant pled guilty to three counts of receiving stolen goods. He was sentenced to consecutive terms of one year, two years and seven years, suspended upon the service of four years with five years probation and $1,000 restitution. This appeal is from denial, after a hearing, of Post-Conviction *256 Relief. We affirm the guilty plea on the first count. We vacate the remaining pleas and remand for further proceedings.

Appellant was charged in three separate indictments for the three counts. The first indictment was presented to the grand jury and duly acted on by them. That indictment is not in issue here. The remaining two indictments were not presented to the grand jury.

Code of Laws of South Carolina Ann. §§ 17-23-120 to 140 (Supp. 1981) require that a criminal defendant must sign a waiver of indictment before pleading guilty to an indictment which has not been presented to the grand jury. Through an administrative error, appellant never signed the waivers.

By their plain language, §§ 17-23-130 and 140 make a written waiver of presentment of indictments not presented to a grand jury mandatory before the trial judge can accept the plea. We therefore hold appellant’s failure to properly execute the waivers renders the pleas invalid.

The plea on indictment number 79-GS-39-960 is affirmed. The pleas on the two indictments not presented to the grand jury are vacated and the case remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Tumbleston
654 S.E.2d 849 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2007)
State v. Gentry
610 S.E.2d 494 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2005)
State v. Davis
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2005
State v. Sibert
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2004
State v. Smalls
581 S.E.2d 850 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2003)
State v. Jackson
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2003
Odom v. State
566 S.E.2d 528 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2002)
State v. Wilkes
550 S.E.2d 332 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2001)
In the Interest of Jason T.
531 S.E.2d 544 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2000)
State v. Clarkson
523 S.E.2d 817 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1999)
State v. McNeil
445 S.E.2d 461 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1994)
State v. Evans
415 S.E.2d 816 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1992)
Phillips v. State
314 S.E.2d 313 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1984)
State v. Suttles
302 S.E.2d 338 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1983)
State v. Martin
294 S.E.2d 345 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
294 S.E.2d 344, 278 S.C. 255, 1982 S.C. LEXIS 412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/summerall-v-state-sc-1982.