State v. Martin
Opinion
Appellant pled guilty to receiving stolen goods and was sentenced to eight years. We vacate the guilty plea and remand for further proceedings.
Appellant was indicted for housebreaking and larceny but pled guilty to receiving stolen goods. 1 Appellant was never indicted for receiving stolen goods. No presentment to the grand jury was made for receiving stolen goods. No waiver of presentment was accomplished in accord with South Carolina Code of Laws Ann. §§ 17-23-120 to 140 (Supp. 1981).
The plea must be vacated under our holding in Summerall v. State, S. C. 294 S. E. (2d) 344 Op. No. 21773, filed August 9, 1982 that the requirements of §§ 17-23-120 to 140 are mandatory. We therefore vacate appellant’s guilty plea and remand for further proceedings consistent with the Summerall decision.
Receiving stolen goods is not a lesser included offense of larceny. State v. Hamilton, 172 S. C. 453, 174 S. E. 396 (1934).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
294 S.E.2d 345 (State v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.