Sullivan v. State

760 So. 2d 975, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5694, 2000 WL 572702
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sullivan v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 801 So. 2d 185
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 12, 2000·No. Nos. 5D98-3001, 5D98-3073·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Following Speed v. State, 732 So.2d 17 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999), and its progeny, we reject the appellant’s argument that the Prisoner Release Reoffender Act (PRRA) is unconstitutional.

The state cross-appealed a sentencing issue alleging that appellant’s thirty year sentence imposed for the offense of robbery with a firearm, a first degree felony punishable by a term of years not exceeding life, should have been enhanced under the PRRA to a life sentence. The decision in State v. Maples, 739 So.2d 127 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999) requires enhancement and the cause is remanded for imposition of a life sentence.

SENTENCE VACATED IN PART; REMANDED.

COBB, PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sullivan v. State, 760 So. 2d 975, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5694, 2000 WL 572702 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

760 So. 2d 975 (Sullivan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Speed v. State
732 So. 2d 17 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
State v. Maples
739 So. 2d 127 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)