Sullivan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sullivan v. State

826 So. 2d 327, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 3719, 2002 WL 440579

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sullivan v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 898 So. 2d 105 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 22, 2002·No. No. 2D02-596·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Anthony D. Sullivan appeals the trial court’s order denying his motion for post-conviction relief and motion to withdraw plea. We affirm the order denying motion to withdraw plea based upon the trial court’s finding that it was untimely filed. We also affirm the order denying motion for postconviction relief; however, our af-firmance is without prejudice to any right Sullivan might have to file a motion containing a legally sufficient oath. The contents necessary for that oath are located in Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.987.

Affirmed.

PARKER, NORTHCUTT, and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Anthony D. Sullivan appeals the trial court’s order denying his motion for post-conviction relief and motion to withdraw plea. We affirm the order denying motion to withdraw plea based upon the trial court’s finding that it was untimely filed. We also affirm the order denying motion for postconviction relief; however, our af-firmance is without prejudice to any right Sullivan might have to file a motion containing a legally sufficient oath. The contents necessary for that oath are located in Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.987.

Affirmed.

PARKER, NORTHCUTT, and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.

Sullivan v. State, 826 So. 2d 327, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 3719, 2002 WL 440579 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

826 So. 2d 327 (Sullivan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.