Sullivan v. State

826 So. 2d 327, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 3719, 2002 WL 440579
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 22, 2002
DocketNo. 2D02-596
StatusPublished

This text of 826 So. 2d 327 (Sullivan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sullivan v. State, 826 So. 2d 327, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 3719, 2002 WL 440579 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Anthony D. Sullivan appeals the trial court’s order denying his motion for post-conviction relief and motion to withdraw plea. We affirm the order denying motion to withdraw plea based upon the trial court’s finding that it was untimely filed. We also affirm the order denying motion for postconviction relief; however, our af-firmance is without prejudice to any right Sullivan might have to file a motion containing a legally sufficient oath. The contents necessary for that oath are located in Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.987.

Affirmed.

PARKER, NORTHCUTT, and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
826 So. 2d 327, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 3719, 2002 WL 440579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sullivan-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.