Sullivan v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad
Opinion
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 96 Conn. App. 741 (AC 24895), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the trial court’s ruling precluding the expert testimony of John W. Kennish, an expert in premises security, on the [920]*920ground that he had no experience, training or special knowledge relating to railroad security systems?
“2. Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the trial court’s jury instruction on superseding and intervening causes?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
908 A.2d 545 (Sullivan v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.