Sullivan v. Commissioner

23 B.T.A. 147, 1931 BTA LEXIS 1923
United States Board of Tax Appeals·Decided May 11, 1931·No. Docket No. 29616.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[148]*148OPINION.

Matthews:

The issue involved in the present proceeding is the same as that involved in the case of A. E. Giffin, 19 B. T. A. 1248. In that case we held that, where real estate was sold by one not a dealer and the profit therefrom reported upon the installment sales basis, expenses incurred in connection therewith were not deductible as ordinary and necessary business expenses in the year of the sale •but served to reduce the “ total profit realized or to be realized,” thus being spread over the same period as the installment payments. See also D. F. McCrimmon, 20 B. T. A. 384.

We are, therefore, of the opinion that the action of the respondent in disallowing the deduction for the expenses in question in 1924 was correct.

Judgment will be entered for the respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sullivan v. Commissioner, 23 B.T.A. 147, 1931 BTA LEXIS 1923 (bta 1931).

23 B.T.A. 147 (Sullivan v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sullivan v. Commissioner
23 B.T.A. 147 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1931)