Sullivan v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.
This text of 63 N.E.2d 76 (Sullivan v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The evidence presented questions of fact as to defendants’ negligence, the causal relation of such negligence to the accident and the authority of the witness Cavanagh to represent the defendants. It was error to grant defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint after the rendition of a verdict in favor of the plaintiff.
The judgments should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.
Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thacher and Dye, JJ., concur.
Judgment reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
63 N.E.2d 76, 294 N.Y. 497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sullivan-v-central-hanover-bank-trust-co-ny-1945.