Sullivan v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.

63 N.E.2d 76, 294 N.Y. 497
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 19, 1945·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The evidence presented questions of fact as to defendants’ negligence, the causal relation of such negligence to the accident and the authority of the witness Cavanagh to represent the defendants. It was error to grant defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint after the rendition of a verdict in favor of the plaintiff.

The judgments should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thacher and Dye, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sullivan v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 63 N.E.2d 76, 294 N.Y. 497 (N.Y. 1945).

63 N.E.2d 76 (Sullivan v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

De Vito v. United Air Lines, Inc.
98 F. Supp. 88 (E.D. New York, 1951)
Sullivan v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.
271 A.D.2d 799 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1946)