Sullivan v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.

63 N.E.2d 76, 294 N.Y. 497
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 19, 1945
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 63 N.E.2d 76 (Sullivan v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sullivan v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 63 N.E.2d 76, 294 N.Y. 497 (N.Y. 1945).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The evidence presented questions of fact as to defendants’ negligence, the causal relation of such negligence to the accident and the authority of the witness Cavanagh to represent the defendants. It was error to grant defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint after the rendition of a verdict in favor of the plaintiff.

The judgments should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thacher and Dye, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

De Vito v. United Air Lines, Inc.
98 F. Supp. 88 (E.D. New York, 1951)
Sullivan v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.
271 A.D.2d 799 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 N.E.2d 76, 294 N.Y. 497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sullivan-v-central-hanover-bank-trust-co-ny-1945.