Sullivan v. Bruce

E.D. Arkansas

Sullivan v. Bruce

DecidedSeptember 22, 2022

Docket3:22-cv-00217

StatusUnknown

This text of Sullivan v. Bruce (Sullivan v. Bruce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sullivan v. Bruce, (E.D. Ark. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION KEVIN JAMES SULLIVAN PLAINTIFF #26567 v. CASE NO. 3:22-CV-00217-BSM JIMMY D BRUCE JR, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Kevin James Sullivan’s motions to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. Nos. 1, 7] are granted, but he must pay the full filing fee. An initial filing fee of $1.63 is assessed. The Administrator of the Green County Detention Facility, or his designee, is directed to send to

the clerk of court payments from Sullivan’s prison trust account each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00 until the $350 filing fee is fully paid. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The payments shall be clearly identified by this case name and number. The clerk is directed to send a copy of this order to the Administrator of the Green County Detention Facility, 1809

North Rockingchair Rd., Paragould, AR 72450. The clerk is directed to stay this case because Sullivan may not proceed with this federal claim while his state criminal case, State v. Sullivan, 28CR-22-498 (Green County Circuit Court) is pending. Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 43-45 (1971); Yamaha Motor

Corporation, U.S.A. v. Stroud, 179 F.3d 598, 603-04 (8th Cir. 1999). Sullivan can move to reopen this case after final disposition of his state criminal case, including appeals. Any motion to reopen must be filed within sixty days of that final disposition. If Sullivan does not file a timely motion to reopen or a status report by September 20, 2023, then this case

may be dismiss without prejudice. Sullivan’s motion for copies of his state probation and parole documents [Doc. No. 4] is denied because the court does not have access to those papers. Sullivan’s motion for status update [Doc. No. 5] is granted. The clerk is directed to send Sullivan a copy of the docket sheet along with this order. IT IS SO ORDERED this 22nd day of September, 2022.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION KEVIN JAMES SULLIVAN PLAINTIFF #26567 v. CASE NO. 3:22-CV-00217-BSM JIMMY D BRUCE JR, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Kevin James Sullivan’s motions to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. Nos. 1, 7] are granted, but he must pay the full filing fee. An initial filing fee of $1.63 is assessed. The Administrator of the Green County Detention Facility, or his designee, is directed to send to

the clerk of court payments from Sullivan’s prison trust account each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00 until the $350 filing fee is fully paid. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The payments shall be clearly identified by this case name and number. The clerk is directed to send a copy of this order to the Administrator of the Green County Detention Facility, 1809

North Rockingchair Rd., Paragould, AR 72450. The clerk is directed to stay this case because Sullivan may not proceed with this federal claim while his state criminal case, State v. Sullivan, 28CR-22-498 (Green County Circuit Court) is pending. Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 43-45 (1971); Yamaha Motor

Corporation, U.S.A. v. Stroud, 179 F.3d 598, 603-04 (8th Cir. 1999). Sullivan can move to reopen this case after final disposition of his state criminal case, including appeals. Any motion to reopen must be filed within sixty days of that final disposition. If Sullivan does not file a timely motion to reopen or a status report by September 20, 2023, then this case

may be dismiss without prejudice. Sullivan’s motion for copies of his state probation and parole documents [Doc. No. 4] is denied because the court does not have access to those papers. Sullivan’s motion for status update [Doc. No. 5] is granted. The clerk is directed to send Sullivan a copy of the docket sheet along with this order. IT IS SO ORDERED this 22nd day of September, 2022.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Sullivan v. Bruce, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sullivan-v-bruce-ared-2022.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack