Sullivan v. Baxter

22 N.E. 895, 150 Mass. 261, 1889 Mass. LEXIS 69
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided November 29, 1889·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Field, J.

The conversion of the derrick by the defendant was a single wrongful act, for which only one action could be maintained. The plaintiff, having taken judgment in the former action for this conversion, cannot maintain the present action, because the cause of action is the same and the parties are the same as in the former action. The plaintiff could have alleged and proved in the former action any special damages which he was entitled to recover, and special damages do not constitute a separate cause of action. Trask v. Hartford New Haven Railroad, 2 Allen, 331. Folsom v. Clemence, 119 Mass. 473. McCaffrey v. Carter, 125 Mass. 330. Knowlton v. New York & New England Railroad, 147 Mass. 606. Bassett v. Connecticut River Railroad, ante, 178.

Judgment for the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sullivan v. Baxter, 22 N.E. 895, 150 Mass. 261, 1889 Mass. LEXIS 69 (Mass. 1889).

22 N.E. 895 (Sullivan v. Baxter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sandler v. Silk
198 N.E. 749 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1935)
Magaw v. Beals
172 N.E. 347 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1930)
Brice v. Starr
156 P. 12 (Washington Supreme Court, 1916)
Cole v. Bay State Street Railway Co.
223 Mass. 442 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1916)
Stern v. Riches
87 N.W. 555 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1901)
Clare v. New York & New England Railroad
51 N.E. 1083 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1898)
Bliss v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
36 N.E. 65 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1894)
Ellis & Osborn v. Crowl
46 Kan. 100 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1891)