Folsom v. Clemence
119 Mass. 473, 1876 Mass. LEXIS 60
Opinion
The taking by one act of several chattels of the same person will not sustain more than one action. The judgment in the first action is a bar to this. Marble v. Keyes, 9 Gray, 221. Bennett v. Hood, 1 Allen, 47. Trask v. Hartford & New Haven Railroad, 2 Allen, 331.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Folsom v. Clemence, 119 Mass. 473, 1876 Mass. LEXIS 60 (Mass. 1876).
119 Mass. 473 (Folsom v. Clemence) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bonifazi v. Breschi
6 N.E.2d 816 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1937)
Magaw v. Beals
172 N.E. 347 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1930)
Hesser v. Johnson
1903 OK 57 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1903)
Stern v. Riches
87 N.W. 555 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1901)
Huffman v. Knight
60 P. 207 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1900)
Wheeler Savings Bank v. Tracey
42 S.W. 946 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1897)
Bliss v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
36 N.E. 65 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1894)
Sullivan v. Baxter
22 N.E. 895 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1889)
Funk v. Funk
35 Mo. App. 246 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1889)
Knowlton v. New York & New England Railroad
1 L.R.A. 625 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1888)
Wichita & Western Railroad v. Beebe
39 Kan. 465 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1888)
Child v. Boston & Fairhaven Iron Works
19 F. 258 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1884)
Stevens v. Haskell
70 Me. 202 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1879)
McCaffrey v. Carter
125 Mass. 330 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1878)