Sullins v. State

1917 OK CR 62, 163 P. 721, 13 Okla. Crim. 244, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 63
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedMarch 24, 1917
DocketNo. A-2714.
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 1917 OK CR 62 (Sullins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sullins v. State, 1917 OK CR 62, 163 P. 721, 13 Okla. Crim. 244, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 63 (Okla. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

DOYLE, P. J.

Noah Sullins, plaintiff in error, was cried in the county court of Pottawatomie county, on an information charging the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquors with the unlawful intent to sell the same. The. jury found him “guilty as charged in the information.” Upon this verdict he was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for a period of 30 days and to pay a fine of $50.

The only error assigned is that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict. No brief has been filed.

The evidence' on the part of the state shows that three deputy sheriffs raided the place on South Broadway, Shawnee, known as the “Old Herald Building”; that the, defendant' was standing at the door and attempted to prevent the officers from entering the place; that they *245 had to push him out of the way to get by; that they foúnd a bottle of whisky and whisky glasses. There was no evidence on the part of the defense.

An examination of the evidence satisfies us that the same is sufficient to sustain the verdict. No error being shown, the judgment is affirmed.

ARMSTRONG and BRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

White v. Board of Education of Silver City
75 P.2d 712 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1938)
Graham County v. Dowell
71 P.2d 1019 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1937)
Lehi City v. Meiling, City Recorder
48 P.2d 530 (Utah Supreme Court, 1935)
Herndon v. Anderson
1933 OK 490 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1933)
French v. County of Lewis and Clark
288 P. 455 (Montana Supreme Court, 1930)
Standard Oil Co. of Kentucky v. Limestone County
124 So. 523 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1929)
Gadd v. McGuire
231 P. 754 (California Court of Appeal, 1924)
Love v. Dunaway
215 P. 822 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1923)
De Graftenreid v. Strong
206 P. 694 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1922)
Hardin v. Klickitat County
197 P. 644 (Washington Supreme Court, 1921)
Hamilton v. Portland Pier Site District
112 A. 836 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1921)
State ex rel. Farmers' & Stockmen's Bank of Estancia v. Romero
175 P. 771 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1917 OK CR 62, 163 P. 721, 13 Okla. Crim. 244, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sullins-v-state-oklacrimapp-1917.