Suggs v. Suggs

26 S.E.2d 886, 196 Ga. 505, 1943 Ga. LEXIS 372
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 9, 1943
Docket14620.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 26 S.E.2d 886 (Suggs v. Suggs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Suggs v. Suggs, 26 S.E.2d 886, 196 Ga. 505, 1943 Ga. LEXIS 372 (Ga. 1943).

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

This case was tried before Judge Bond Almand, and he overruled a motion for new trial. Subsequently, by reason of a contest over the judgeship and not on account of death, Judge Almand was succeeded by Judge Frank A. Hooper Jr., who, after assuming office, certified the bill of exceptions. The overruling of the motion for new trial was the error alleged in the bill of exceptions. The defendant in error moved to dismiss the writ of error.

The Code declares: “The bill of exceptions shall be tendered to the judge who presided in the cause.” § 6-902. “If the judge trying the cause shall resign, or otherwise cease to hold his office as judge, when the bill of exceptions shall be tendered, he may nevertheless sign and certify.” § 6-906. This section also makes provision for having the bill of exceptions certified where the trial judge dies. There is no statutory provision whereby any judge, other than the one trying the cause, may verify an ordinary final bill of exceptions. Scott v. State, 5 Ga. App. 812 (63 S. E. 936); Wright v. State, 5 Ga. App. 813 (63 S. E. 936); Luke v. Gilley, 23 Ga. App. 667 (99 S. E. 135); Ownby v. Barwick, 177 Ga. 878 (171 S. E. 567). Where one judge has tried the case and overruled a motion for new trial, his successor in office has no power to sign and certify a bill of exceptions, to review that judgment. This court is without jurisdiction to pass upon the correctness of any decision of a judge of the superior court, who is neither dead nor laboring under some legal disability, which decision has not been authenticated or verified by the certificate of the judge whose rulings it is sought to review.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Day v. Harper
98 S.E.2d 140 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1957)
Altman v. Spahos
98 S.E.2d 95 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1957)
Jett v. Jones
74 S.E.2d 483 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 S.E.2d 886, 196 Ga. 505, 1943 Ga. LEXIS 372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/suggs-v-suggs-ga-1943.