Luke v. Gilley

99 S.E. 135, 23 Ga. App. 667, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 278
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 22, 1919·No. 10325·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Stephens, J.

An ordinary final bill of exceptions in a case, civil or criminal, should be presented to the judge who presided in the cause, and "certified by him, except in case of his dying subsequently to the ruling complained of and before the statutory period for certifying has expired. Where, just before the expiration of a term of office of a judge of a city court, he overrules a motion for a new trial, the bill of exceptions complaining of this ruling should be tendered to him and signed and certified by him; and his successor in office has no power to sign and certify it. Civil Code, §§ 6152, 6155; Scott v. State, 5 Ga. App. 812 (63 S. E. 936). This court is therefore without jurisdiction in this ease, and the writ of error is

Dismissed.

Broyles, P. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke v. Gilley, 99 S.E. 135, 23 Ga. App. 667, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 278 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

99 S.E. 135 (Luke v. Gilley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jett v. Jones
74 S.E.2d 483 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)
Suggs v. Suggs
26 S.E.2d 886 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1943)