Suggs v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Suggs v. State

631 So. 2d 343, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3511, 1994 WL 41391

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Suggs v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 624 So. 2d 833 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 3, 1994·No. No. 94-165·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner seeks habeas corpus relief alleging the trial judge considered and ruled on a motion to revoke bond while a motion to [344]*344disqualify the trial judge was before the court.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is granted and the petitioner’s original bond is reinstated without prejudice to the state to refile its motion to revoke the petitioner’s bond. See Berkowitz v. Rieser, 625 So.2d 971 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993).

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS GRANTED.

DAUKSCH, COBB and W. SHARP, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner seeks habeas corpus relief alleging the trial judge considered and ruled on a motion to revoke bond while a motion to [344]*344disqualify the trial judge was before the court.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is granted and the petitioner’s original bond is reinstated without prejudice to the state to refile its motion to revoke the petitioner’s bond. See Berkowitz v. Rieser, 625 So.2d 971 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993).

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS GRANTED.

DAUKSCH, COBB and W. SHARP, JJ., concur.

Suggs v. State, 631 So. 2d 343, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3511, 1994 WL 41391 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

631 So. 2d 343 (Suggs v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related