Suggs v. State
606 So. 2d 506, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11210, 1992 WL 308632
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Suggs v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 624 So. 2d 833 →
Opinion
Since condition (11) of the order which placed appellant on probation was not orally pronounced at sentencing, we strike that condition from the probation order. See Shaddix v. State, 599 So.2d 269 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Vincent v. State, 600 So.2d 1292 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). Otherwise, we affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Suggs v. State, 606 So. 2d 506, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11210, 1992 WL 308632 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
606 So. 2d 506 (Suggs v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Vincent v. State
600 So. 2d 1292 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Shaddix v. State
599 So. 2d 269 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)