Suffield Bank v. Berman
597 A.2d 340, 220 Conn. 914, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 436
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Suffield Bank v. Berman. Read the opinion of the Court — 228 Conn. 766 →
Opinion
The defendants William W. Berman, James J. Luzzi and Thomas E. Kohanski’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 25 Conn. App. 369, is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Suffield Bank v. Berman, 597 A.2d 340, 220 Conn. 914, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 436 (Colo. 1991).
597 A.2d 340 (Suffield Bank v. Berman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Suffield Bank v. Berman
594 A.2d 493 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1991)