Suffield Bank v. Berman
597 A.2d 340, 220 Conn. 914, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 436
This text of 597 A.2d 340 (Suffield Bank v. Berman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Suffield Bank v. Berman, 597 A.2d 340, 220 Conn. 914, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 436 (Colo. 1991).
Opinion
The defendants William W. Berman, James J. Luzzi and Thomas E. Kohanski’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 25 Conn. App. 369, is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Suffield Bank v. Berman
594 A.2d 493 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1991)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
597 A.2d 340, 220 Conn. 914, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/suffield-bank-v-berman-conn-1991.