Succession of Theriot

43 So. 265, 118 La. 648, 1907 La. LEXIS 779
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 4, 1907·No. No. 16,252·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

MONROE, J.

The delay for the return of the appeal in this case was extended, but the transcript was not filed in this court until after the return day, and appellee moves to dismiss on that ground. The motion must prevail. Hudson et al. v. Garrett, Sheriff, et al., 47 La. Ann. 1534, 18 South. 510; Building & Loan Ass’n v. Church, 48 La. Ann. 1458, 21 South. 24.

It is therefore adjudged and- decreed that the appeal herein be dismissed, at the costs of the appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Succession of Theriot, 43 So. 265, 118 La. 648, 1907 La. LEXIS 779 (La. 1907).

43 So. 265 (Succession of Theriot) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vicknair v. Vicknair
29 So. 2d 706 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1947)
Gibson v. G. Dounson, Inc.
147 So. 370 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1933)
Landry v. T. Le Boeuf & Sons
95 So. 391 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1922)
J. S. Terry Const. Co. v. James K. Sutherlin Co.
82 So. 384 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1919)
Richardson v. Cobb
57 So. 889 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1912)
Girod v. Monroe Brick Co.
52 So. 550 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1910)
Succession of Theriot
45 So. 286 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1907)