Succession of Morris

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Succession of Morris

66 So. 542, 136 La. 69, 1914 La. LEXIS 1902

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedNovember 16, 1914

DocketNo. 20914

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 66 So. 542 (Succession of Morris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Succession of Morris, 66 So. 542, 136 La. 69, 1914 La. LEXIS 1902 (La. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

On Motion to Dismiss Appeal.

SOMMERVIDLE, J.

The judgment appealed from was rendered, by consent of parties, out of term time, and during vacation. The appeal was taken by motion, during the vacation of the court, and without citation to the appellee. On the authority of Bolling v. Anderson, 10 La. Ann. 650, McGaw v. O’Bierne, 124 La. 989, 50 South. 819, and Frederick v. Marx, 127 La. 149, 53 South. 474, the appeal will have to be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On Motion to Dismiss Appeal.

SOMMERVIDLE, J.

The judgment appealed from was rendered, by consent of parties, out of term time, and during vacation. The appeal was taken by motion, during the vacation of the court, and without citation to the appellee. On the authority of Bolling v. Anderson, 10 La. Ann. 650, McGaw v. O’Bierne, 124 La. 989, 50 South. 819, and Frederick v. Marx, 127 La. 149, 53 South. 474, the appeal will have to be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

66 So. 542, 136 La. 69, 1914 La. LEXIS 1902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/succession-of-morris-la-1914.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack