Succession of Morris

66 So. 542, 136 La. 69, 1914 La. LEXIS 1902
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided November 16, 1914·No. No. 20914·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

On Motion to Dismiss Appeal.

SOMMERVIDLE, J.

The judgment appealed from was rendered, by consent of parties, out of term time, and during vacation. The appeal was taken by motion, during the vacation of the court, and without citation to the appellee. On the authority of Bolling v. Anderson, 10 La. Ann. 650, McGaw v. O’Bierne, 124 La. 989, 50 South. 819, and Frederick v. Marx, 127 La. 149, 53 South. 474, the appeal will have to be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Succession of Morris, 66 So. 542, 136 La. 69, 1914 La. LEXIS 1902 (La. 1914).

66 So. 542 (Succession of Morris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hunt v. Hunt
185 So. 284 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1938)
Ducre v. Succession of Ducre
118 So. 864 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1928)