Bolling v. Anderson
This text of 10 La. Ann. 650 (Bolling v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appeal in this case was applied for by petition at chambers, after the adjournment of court.
The petition for an appeal does not pray for a citation, nor does it appear that the appellant ever applied for one. The plaintiff and appellee prays for a dismissal of the appeal, on the ground that he has not been cited to appear in the appellate court.
The authority of the cases .of Walker et al. v. Martolo, 18 L. R., 50, and Hezekiah Pratt v. James Erwin, 6 An. Rep., 115, are decisive, and the motion to dismiss must prevail.
It is therefore ordered', adjudged and decreed that the appeal in this case he dismissed, at the costs of the appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 La. Ann. 650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bolling-v-anderson-la-1855.