Bolling v. Anderson

10 La. Ann. 650
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 15, 1855·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Merrick, C. J.

The appeal in this case was applied for by petition at chambers, after the adjournment of court.

The petition for an appeal does not pray for a citation, nor does it appear that the appellant ever applied for one. The plaintiff and appellee prays for a dismissal of the appeal, on the ground that he has not been cited to appear in the appellate court.

The authority of the cases .of Walker et al. v. Martolo, 18 L. R., 50, and Hezekiah Pratt v. James Erwin, 6 An. Rep., 115, are decisive, and the motion to dismiss must prevail.

It is therefore ordered', adjudged and decreed that the appeal in this case he dismissed, at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bolling v. Anderson, 10 La. Ann. 650 (La. 1855).

10 La. Ann. 650 (Bolling v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tregre v. Kratzer
144 So. 644 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1932)
Jackson v. Weeden
135 So. 745 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1931)
Investors' Mortgage Co. v. Aleman
115 So. 383 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1927)
Comire v. Schiro Amusement Co.
6 La. App. 441 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1927)
State v. Salmen Brick & Lumber Co.
90 So. 273 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1921)
Succession of Morris
66 So. 542 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1914)
McCutchen v. Hudson
61 So. 157 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1913)
Succession of Le Sage
36 So. 757 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1903)
Handlin v. Dodt
34 So. 881 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1903)