Succession of Glancey

38 So. 554, 114 La. 766, 1905 La. LEXIS 536
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided May 8, 1905·No. No. 15,584·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PROVO STY, J.

The widow, as survivor in community, holds in usufruct all the property of the succession. There are no debts, ■except some court costs, which the attorney •of the succession has promised to pay, with which promise the officers decíate themselves to be satisfied. There is but one legacy, and it has not to be paid, owing to the fact that the legatee lives with the widow ■and is unwilling that it should be paid before the death of the widow.

Under these circumstances, the lower court properly rejected the demand for the appointment of- a dative testamentary executor, as being unnecessary.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Succession of Glancey, 38 So. 554, 114 La. 766, 1905 La. LEXIS 536 (La. 1905).

38 So. 554 (Succession of Glancey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Deshotels v. Lafleur
64 So. 905 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1914)