Succession of Glancey

38 So. 554, 114 La. 766, 1905 La. LEXIS 536
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMay 8, 1905
DocketNo. 15,584
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 38 So. 554 (Succession of Glancey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Succession of Glancey, 38 So. 554, 114 La. 766, 1905 La. LEXIS 536 (La. 1905).

Opinion

PROVO STY, J.

The widow, as survivor in community, holds in usufruct all the property of the succession. There are no debts, ■except some court costs, which the attorney •of the succession has promised to pay, with which promise the officers decíate themselves to be satisfied. There is but one legacy, and it has not to be paid, owing to the fact that the legatee lives with the widow ■and is unwilling that it should be paid before the death of the widow.

Under these circumstances, the lower court properly rejected the demand for the appointment of- a dative testamentary executor, as being unnecessary.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Deshotels v. Lafleur
64 So. 905 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 So. 554, 114 La. 766, 1905 La. LEXIS 536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/succession-of-glancey-la-1905.