Sublett v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Sublett v. State

969 S.W.2d 666, 334 Ark. 226, 1998 Ark. LEXIS 461

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedJuly 16, 1998

DocketCR 97-49

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 969 S.W.2d 666 (Sublett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sublett v. State, 969 S.W.2d 666, 334 Ark. 226, 1998 Ark. LEXIS 461 (Ark. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appellant, Dennis Sublett, by and through his attorney, Kenneth G. Fuchs, has filed a motion for belated appeal. The record in his case was tendered on September 20, 1996, and a completed transcript was filed on February 3, 1997. Since that time, Mr. Fuchs has been granted six extensions to file the appellant’s brief, the last of which was designated as a final extension. On March 3, 1998, the date the appellant’s brief was due, Mr. Fuchs tendered a no-merit brief. Thereafter, on March 27, 1998, Mr. Fuchs and the Attorney General filed a joint motion for compliance for the purpose of correcting the appellant’s brief. We granted the motion and set a new briefing schedule, setting the due date for the appellant’s brief as May 26, 1998. On June 30, 1998, Mr. Fuchs filed this motion for belated appeal.

We grant Mr. Fuchs’s motion, and we order him to appear on September 10, 1998, to show cause why he should not be held in contempt for failing to file the appellant’s brief.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The appellant, Dennis Sublett, by and through his attorney, Kenneth G. Fuchs, has filed a motion for belated appeal. The record in his case was tendered on September 20, 1996, and a completed transcript was filed on February 3, 1997. Since that time, Mr. Fuchs has been granted six extensions to file the appellant’s brief, the last of which was designated as a final extension. On March 3, 1998, the date the appellant’s brief was due, Mr. Fuchs tendered a no-merit brief. Thereafter, on March 27, 1998, Mr. Fuchs and the Attorney General filed a joint motion for compliance for the purpose of correcting the appellant’s brief. We granted the motion and set a new briefing schedule, setting the due date for the appellant’s brief as May 26, 1998. On June 30, 1998, Mr. Fuchs filed this motion for belated appeal.

We grant Mr. Fuchs’s motion, and we order him to appear on September 10, 1998, to show cause why he should not be held in contempt for failing to file the appellant’s brief.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

969 S.W.2d 666, 334 Ark. 226, 1998 Ark. LEXIS 461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sublett-v-state-ark-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack