Stuyvesant v. Swaine

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wee eK UNITED STATES EX REL. CURTIS VAN STUYVESANT, Plaintiff, -against- 24 CIVIL 3598 (PAE) JUDGMENT LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN; JENNIFER ROCHON; LEWIS A. KAPLAN; COLLEEN MCMAHON; LORETTA PRESKA; NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD; DEBRA FREEMAN; RUBY KRAJICK; DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON; CATHERINE O'HAGAIN WOLF, Defendants. wenn K It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated June 20, 2024, The Court dismisses Stuyvesant’s claims against Laura Taylor Swain, Jennifer Rochon, Lewis A. Kaplan, Colleen McMahon, Loretta A. Preska, Naomi Reice Buchwald, Debra Freeman, Debra Ann Livingston, Ruby Krajick and Catherine O'Hagan Wolf, and denies his petition in full. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444- 45 (1962); accordingly, this case is closed. Dated: New York, New York June 21, 2024 DANIEL ORTIZ Acting Clerk of Court BY: Deputy Clerk