Stuyvesant Insurance Company v. Kelly

382 F.2d 991, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4972
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedOctober 3, 1967
Docket30683
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 382 F.2d 991 (Stuyvesant Insurance Company v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stuyvesant Insurance Company v. Kelly, 382 F.2d 991, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4972 (2d Cir. 1967).

Opinion

382 F.2d 991

The STUYVESANT INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Audrey R. KELLY, Commissioner of Insurance of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Defendant-Appellant, and Dean
Construction Company, Inc., and The New Atlantic Beach Hotel
and Cabana Club, Inc., Defendants-Appellees, and Helen T.
Johnson, as Administratrix of the Estate of Alma W. Taylor,
deceased, Hilda Berg, Sidney Berg, Frank L. Newburger, Jr.,
and Dorothy E. Newburger, Defendants.

No. 29, Docket 30683.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued Sept. 20, 1967.
Decided Oct. 3, 1967.

David A. Ticktin, New York City (Ticktin & Bleich, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee.

Richard Rodwin, New York City (Rodwin, Rodwin & Gelin New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellant.

Leo Fixler, New York City, for defendants-appellees.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, WATERMAN and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Audrey R. Kelly, Commissioner of Insurance of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, appeals from an order of the District Court for the Southern District of New York granting summary judgment in favor of Dean Construction Company, Inc. and The New Atlantic Beach Hotel and Cabana Club, Inc., Stuyvesant v. Dean Construction Co., 254 F.Supp. 102 (S.D.N.Y.1966).

Although we note that there was a minor error in the district court opinion in stating that the Commissioner of Insurance had filed notice of appeal to the New York Court of Appeals from the decision of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court reported as Dean Construction Co. v. Agricultural Ins. Co., 22 A.D.2d 82, 254 N.Y.S.2d 196 (1964), this was in no way germane to the determination of the issues. We affirm for the reasons stated in Judge Bryan's decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hausler v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
127 F. Supp. 3d 17 (S.D. New York, 2015)
Rubinbaum LLP v. Related Corporate Partners V
154 F. Supp. 2d 481 (S.D. New York, 2001)
National Union Fire Insurance v. Coric
924 F. Supp. 373 (N.D. New York, 1996)
Irving Trust Co. v. Nationwide Leisure Corp.
711 F. Supp. 166 (S.D. New York, 1989)
Amoco Transport Co. v. Dietze, Inc.
582 F. Supp. 804 (S.D. New York, 1984)
Bankers Trust Co. of Western New York v. Crawford
559 F. Supp. 1359 (W.D. New York, 1983)
Libby v. City National Bank
592 F.2d 504 (Third Circuit, 1979)
Lazzaro v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
465 F. Supp. 614 (D. Massachusetts, 1979)
Libby, McNeill, & Libby v. City National Bank
592 F.2d 504 (Ninth Circuit, 1978)
Equifax, Inc. v. Luster
463 F. Supp. 352 (E.D. Arkansas, 1978)
Companion Life Insurance v. Schaffer
442 F. Supp. 826 (S.D. New York, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
382 F.2d 991, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4972, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stuyvesant-insurance-company-v-kelly-ca2-1967.