Sturz v. Fischer

19 A.D. 198, 45 N.Y.S. 1009
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 15, 1897
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 19 A.D. 198 (Sturz v. Fischer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sturz v. Fischer, 19 A.D. 198, 45 N.Y.S. 1009 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1897).

Opinion

Parker, J. :

This is an action for goods sold and delivered.- As matter of defense the defendant alleged in his answer, and proved' upon the trial, that the plaintiff extended the time of payment of such indebtedness, and to that end accepted defendant’s several notes, the face.value of which aggregated the amount of defendant’s indebtedness ; and that'not one of such notes had matured at the time of the commencement of this action. The -action was, therefore^ prematurely brought. (Martens-Turner Company v. Machintosh, 17 App. Div. 419.)

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Patterson, Rumsey, O’Brien and Ingraham, J.J., concurred.

Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, cost to appellant to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller v. Myers
75 Misc. 297 (New York Supreme Court, 1912)
Sturz v. Fischer
46 N.Y.S. 1102 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 A.D. 198, 45 N.Y.S. 1009, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sturz-v-fischer-nyappdiv-1897.