Sturr v. Southern Grocery Stores Inc.
172 S.E. 231, 48 Ga. App. 126, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 489
Opinion
The verdict not being demanded by the law and the evidence, the first grant of a new trial will not be disturbed. Smith v. Maddox-Rucker Banking Co., 135 Ga. 151 (68 S. E. 1031) ; Helmly v. Savannah Office Building Co., 13 Ga. App. 498 (79 S. E. 364) ; Civil Code (1910), § 6204.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sturr v. Southern Grocery Stores Inc., 172 S.E. 231, 48 Ga. App. 126, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 489 (Ga. Ct. App. 1933).
172 S.E. 231 (Sturr v. Southern Grocery Stores Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. Maddox-Rucker Banking Co.
68 S.E. 1031 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1910)
Helmly v. Savannah Office Building Co.
79 S.E. 364 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)