Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Smith v. Maddox-Rucker Banking Co.

Smith v. Maddox-Rucker Banking Co.

68 S.E. 1031, 135 Ga. 151, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 451
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 23, 1910
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 68 S.E. 1031 (Smith v. Maddox-Rucker Banking Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Maddox-Rucker Banking Co., 68 S.E. 1031, 135 Ga. 151, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 451 (Ga. 1910).

Opinion

Beck, J.

We are of the opinion that the rule announced in the case of Cox v. Grady, 132 Ga. 368 (64 S. E. 262), is comprehensive enough to embrace eases of the character of the instant case 'to which the certified questions relate. The ruling there announced answers in the affirmative the first and third questions, and requires an answer in the negative to the second question; and the scope of the discussion in the opinion and in the cases cited in the Cox ease render further argument unnecessary. We are satisfied with the reasoning.in that case and in the case of Holland v. Williams, 3 Ga. App. 636 (60 S. E. 331).

All the Justices concur, except Immpkin, J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wooten v. Nash
190 S.E.2d 89 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)
Peak v. Cody
149 S.E.2d 519 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1966)
Hornsby v. Davis
145 S.E.2d 633 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1965)
Taylor v. Associated Cab Co.
139 S.E.2d 519 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1964)
Wright v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n
176 Cal. App. 2d 176 (California Court of Appeal, 1959)
National Bellas-Hess Co. v. Patrick
175 S.E. 255 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Sturr v. Southern Grocery Stores Inc.
172 S.E. 231 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Mobley v. Bell
171 S.E. 701 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1933)
Sampson v. Smith
116 S.E. 652 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Gamble v. Keyes
166 N.W. 134 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1917)
Parks v. Stevens
94 S.E. 60 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Macon Ry. & Light Co.
93 S.E. 170 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Southern Fertilizer & Chemical Co. v. Peacock
91 S.E. 928 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Helmly v. Savannah Office Building Co.
79 S.E. 364 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Zorn v. Upson Banking & Trust Co.
73 S.E. 652 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1912)
Wilkins v. Barnes
73 S.E. 349 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1912)
Hughes v. Atlanta Steel Co.
71 S.E. 934 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 S.E. 1031, 135 Ga. 151, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-maddox-rucker-banking-co-ga-1910.