STURMFELS v. Frederick

289 S.W.3d 775, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 721, 2009 WL 1449125
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 26, 2009·No. ED 90790·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from that part of a judgment denying plaintiff's request to remove defendant as co-trustee, and to recover damages, interest, and attorney's fees for breach of fiduciary duty. The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a written memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

STURMFELS v. Frederick, 289 S.W.3d 775, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 721, 2009 WL 1449125 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

289 S.W.3d 775 (STURMFELS v. Frederick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Houston v. State
289 S.W.3d 775 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)