STURMFELS v. Frederick

Missouri Court of Appeals

STURMFELS v. Frederick

289 S.W.3d 775, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 721, 2009 WL 1449125

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 26, 2009

DocketED 90790

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 289 S.W.3d 775 (STURMFELS v. Frederick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

STURMFELS v. Frederick, 289 S.W.3d 775, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 721, 2009 WL 1449125 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from that part of a judgment denying plaintiff's request to remove defendant as co-trustee, and to recover damages, interest, and attorney's fees for breach of fiduciary duty. The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a written memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI