Houston v. State
289 S.W.3d 775, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 726, 2009 WL 1439460
Opinion
ORDER
Jerry Houston appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the cireuit court's judgment. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Houston v. State, 289 S.W.3d 775, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 726, 2009 WL 1439460 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
289 S.W.3d 775 (Houston v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
STURMFELS v. Frederick
289 S.W.3d 775 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)