Houston v. State
289 S.W.3d 775, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 726, 2009 WL 1439460
This text of 289 S.W.3d 775 (Houston v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Houston v. State, 289 S.W.3d 775, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 726, 2009 WL 1439460 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
Opinion
ORDER
Jerry Houston appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the cireuit court's judgment. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
STURMFELS v. Frederick
289 S.W.3d 775 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
289 S.W.3d 775, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 726, 2009 WL 1439460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/houston-v-state-moctapp-2009.