Sturkey v. State
42 S.E. 747, 116 Ga. 526, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 162
Opinion
The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict; the alleged newly discovered evidence was either merely cumulative or impeaching; and even if the sentence imposed had been excessive, it would not have been a good ground for granting a new trial. Burgamy v. State, 114 Ga. 852.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sturkey v. State, 42 S.E. 747, 116 Ga. 526, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 162 (Ga. 1902).
42 S.E. 747 (Sturkey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Montgomery v. State
150 S.E. 451 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Sable v. State
97 S.E. 271 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Elzie v. State
94 S.E. 627 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Rumsey v. State
58 S.E. 1066 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)
Bellinger v. State
42 S.E. 747 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)