Bellinger v. State
This text of 42 S.E. 747 (Bellinger v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. In the absence of exceptions pendente lite, this court can not consider exceptions to rulings made more than five months before the hill of exceptions was sued out.
2. Rulings-made upon a demurrer to an accusation, and a motion to quash the . warrant which was the.foundation of the accusation, are not proper grounds of a motion for a new trial.
3. The sentence was not excessive; and if it were, this is not ground for a new trial. Burgamy v. State, 114 Ga. 852 (2); Sturkey v. State, 116 Ga. 526.
4. The evidence authorized the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
42 S.E. 747, 116 Ga. 545, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bellinger-v-state-ga-1902.