Bellinger v. State
42 S.E. 747, 116 Ga. 545, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 171
Opinion
1. In the absence of exceptions pendente lite, this court can not consider exceptions to rulings made more than five months before the hill of exceptions was sued out.
2. Rulings-made upon a demurrer to an accusation, and a motion to quash the . warrant which was the.foundation of the accusation, are not proper grounds of a motion for a new trial.
3. The sentence was not excessive; and if it were, this is not ground for a new trial. Burgamy v. State, 114 Ga. 852 (2); Sturkey v. State, 116 Ga. 526.
4. The evidence authorized the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bellinger v. State, 42 S.E. 747, 116 Ga. 545, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 171 (Ga. 1902).
42 S.E. 747 (Bellinger v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bailey v. State
257 S.E.2d 334 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1979)
Montgomery v. State
150 S.E. 451 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Gore v. State
134 S.E. 36 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1926)
Sable v. State
97 S.E. 271 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Elzie v. State
94 S.E. 627 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Rumsey v. State
58 S.E. 1066 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)
Kelly v. State
55 S.E. 482 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Mayson v. State
53 S.E. 321 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Truitt v. State
52 S.E. 890 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Hill v. State
50 S.E. 57 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)
McCollum v. State
46 S.E. 413 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)