Sturgeon v. Sturgeon
This text of 972 S.W.2d 574 (Sturgeon v. Sturgeon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Charles Sturgeon (Husband) appeals from a judgment entered on April 24,1997 against him and in favor of Elaine Sturgeon (Wife) by Commissioner Victoria McKee. That judgment (1) granted Wife’s motion for attorney’s fees on appeal to be paid to her by Husband, and (2) denied Husband’s motion for disbursement to him of the remainder of the funds which had been placed in the registry of the court from the execution sale of his house.
The judgment of April 24,1997 was signed “Victoria McKee, Commissioner.” It was neither counter-signed nor endorsed by a Circuit Judge or by an Associate Circuit Judge. Commissioner McKee herself, of course, is not a judge selected for office in accordance with and authorized to exercise judicial power by Article V of the Missouri Constitution.
It follows that the order of April 24, 1997 signed by Commissioner McKee and denominated “Judgment” is not a final, appealable judgment and this appeal must therefore be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Slay v. Slay, Gray v. Gray, Bell v. Bell, 965 S.W.2d 845 (Mo. banc 1998).
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
972 S.W.2d 574, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 987, 1998 WL 260988, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sturgeon-v-sturgeon-moctapp-1998.