Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Sturdivant v. State

Sturdivant v. State

84 So. 3d 1053, 2010 WL 3464984, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 13324
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 7, 2010
DocketNo. 1D08-6058
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 84 So. 3d 1053 (Sturdivant v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sturdivant v. State, 84 So. 3d 1053, 2010 WL 3464984, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 13324 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinions

ORDER ON MOTION FOR HEARING EN BANC

A judge of this court requested that this cause be considered en banc in accordance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.381(c). All judges in regular active service have voted on the request. Less than a majority of those judges voted in favor of hearing en banc. Accordingly, the request for hearing en banc is denied.

WOLF, KAHN, WEBSTER, BENTON, VAN NORTWICK, LEWIS, and CLARK, JJ., concur. PADOVANO, J., concurs with an opinion in which DAVIS, J., concurs. WETHERELL, ROWE, and MARSTILLER, JJ., dissent. THOMAS, J., dissents with an opinion in which HAWKES, C.J. and ROBERTS, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rosenthal Law Firm, LLC v. Cohen
210 A.3d 579 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2019)
In re Jane Doe 13-A
136 So. 3d 748 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 So. 3d 1053, 2010 WL 3464984, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 13324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sturdivant-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.