Stump & Gunkle v. Hutchinson
11 Pa. 533
This text of 11 Pa. 533 (Stump & Gunkle v. Hutchinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Stump & Gunkle v. Hutchinson, 11 Pa. 533 (Pa. 1849).
Opinion
The contract laid was absolute: the contract proved was conditional. The promise laid was to deliver in good order: the promise proved was to deliver in good order, “ the dangers of the river and fire excepted.” There was therefore a substantial variance : and all the cases prove that the exception must be stated.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cooke v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.
133 N.W. 303 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1911)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
11 Pa. 533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stump-gunkle-v-hutchinson-pa-1849.