Study Edge, LLC v. N.Y.C. Department of Education

S.D. New York

Study Edge, LLC v. N.Y.C. Department of Education

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided November 20, 2020·No. 1:20-cv-07122·Unknown

Opinion

DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DATE FILED: 11/20/20 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Study Edge, LLC, Plaintiff, 20-cv-7122 (AJN) —V— ORDER N.Y.C. Department of Education, Defendant.

ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: On November 19, 2020, Defendant N.Y.C. Department of Education filed a motion to dismiss. Dkt. No. 12. Pursuant to Rule 3.F of this Court’s Individual Practices in Civil Cases, on or before December 4, 2020, Plaintiff must notify the Court and his adversary in writing whether (1) he intends to file an amended pleading and when he will do so or (2) he will rely on the pleading being attacked. Plaintiff is on notice that declining to amend his pleadings to timely respond to a fully briefed argument in the Defendants’ November 19, 2020 motion to dismiss may well constitute a waiver of the Plaintiffs right to use the amendment process to cure any defects that have been made apparent by the Defendants’ briefing. See Loreley Fin. (Jersey) No. 3 Ltd. v. Wells Fargo Sec., LLC., 797 F.3d 160, 190 (2d Cir. 2015) (leaving “unaltered the grounds on which denial of leave to amend has long been held proper, such as undue delay, bad faith, dilatory motive, and futility”). If Plaintiff chooses to amend, Defendants may then (a) file an answer; (b) file a new motion to dismiss; or (c) submit a letter stating that they rely on the initially-filed motion to dismiss. Nothing in this Order alters the time to amend, answer or move provided by the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure or Local Rules.

SO ORDERED. Dated: November 20, 2020 \| to New York, New York - ALISON J. NATHAN United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DATE FILED: 11/20/20 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Study Edge, LLC, Plaintiff, 20-cv-7122 (AJN) —V— ORDER N.Y.C. Department of Education, Defendant.

ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: On November 19, 2020, Defendant N.Y.C. Department of Education filed a motion to dismiss. Dkt. No. 12. Pursuant to Rule 3.F of this Court’s Individual Practices in Civil Cases, on or before December 4, 2020, Plaintiff must notify the Court and his adversary in writing whether (1) he intends to file an amended pleading and when he will do so or (2) he will rely on the pleading being attacked. Plaintiff is on notice that declining to amend his pleadings to timely respond to a fully briefed argument in the Defendants’ November 19, 2020 motion to dismiss may well constitute a waiver of the Plaintiffs right to use the amendment process to cure any defects that have been made apparent by the Defendants’ briefing. See Loreley Fin. (Jersey) No. 3 Ltd. v. Wells Fargo Sec., LLC., 797 F.3d 160, 190 (2d Cir. 2015) (leaving “unaltered the grounds on which denial of leave to amend has long been held proper, such as undue delay, bad faith, dilatory motive, and futility”). If Plaintiff chooses to amend, Defendants may then (a) file an answer; (b) file a new motion to dismiss; or (c) submit a letter stating that they rely on the initially-filed motion to dismiss. Nothing in this Order alters the time to amend, answer or move provided by the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure or Local Rules.

SO ORDERED. Dated: November 20, 2020 \| to New York, New York - ALISON J. NATHAN United States District Judge

Study Edge, LLC v. N.Y.C. Department of Education, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Pincite

Study Edge, LLC v. N.Y.C. Department of Education (Study Edge, LLC v. N.Y.C. Department of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related