Stuckey v. Stuckey

628 S.W.2d 406, 1982 Mo. App. LEXIS 2716
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 29, 1982
DocketNo. 12554
StatusPublished

This text of 628 S.W.2d 406 (Stuckey v. Stuckey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stuckey v. Stuckey, 628 S.W.2d 406, 1982 Mo. App. LEXIS 2716 (Mo. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Defendant filed a motion for directed verdict at the close of plaintiff’s case in this personal injury action. The court sustained the motion and made a docket entry to that effect. The record reflects the entry of no judgment for defendant consistent with the [407]*407bare docket entry ruling the motion. Such recital does not constitute a final judgment nor an otherwise appealable order. § 512.-020, RSMo 1978; Herndon v. Ford, 470 S.W.2d 168 (Mo.App.1971). The prematurity of this appeal goes to appellate jurisdiction which this court has a duty to ascertain sua sponte. City of Sikeston v. Missouri Utilities Co., 526 S.W.2d 401 (Mo.App.1975).

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gothard v. Spradling
561 S.W.2d 448 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1978)
Herndon v. Ford
470 S.W.2d 168 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1971)
City of Sikeston v. Missouri Utilities Co.
526 S.W.2d 401 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
628 S.W.2d 406, 1982 Mo. App. LEXIS 2716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stuckey-v-stuckey-moctapp-1982.