Gothard v. Spradling

561 S.W.2d 448, 1978 Mo. App. LEXIS 1960
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 20, 1978
Docket10762
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 561 S.W.2d 448 (Gothard v. Spradling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gothard v. Spradling, 561 S.W.2d 448, 1978 Mo. App. LEXIS 1960 (Mo. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinions

TITUS, Judge.

Appellant’s Missouri motor vehicle operator’s license was ordered revoked for a period of one year from April 4, 1976. The revocation order emanated from appellant’s alleged refusal to submit to a chemical test of sobriety within the City of Stockton, Missouri, on February 28, 1976. Thereafter, on March 24, 1976, a restraining order was issued by the regular judge of the court staying the enforcement of the revocation order. Subsequently a special judge was assigned to hear the matter.

Evidence was heard in the cause and the following entry was made on July 22, 1977:

“All parties appear and announce ready to proceed. Plaintiff’s [sic] oral Motion to Dismiss heard and overruled. Defendant’s [sic] Motion for Order Declaring Director of Missouri Department of Revenue in Default overruled.
“Evidence adduced. The Court orders that the temporary restraining order shall be continued until that Motion for New Trial is ruled upon.
“In the event a Notice of Appeal is filed the Appeal Bond shall be in the amount of $150.00.”

Proceedings of this suit are civil in nature and are governed by rules pertaining to appeals of civil proceedings. In re Spencer, 439 S.W.2d 8, 9 (Mo.App.1969). The instant transcript contains nothing more than a minute or docket entry which does not constitute a final judgment from which an appeal may be taken. Williams v. Williams, 480 S.W.2d 525, 527[3] (Mo.App.1972).

The appeal must be, and hereby is, dismissed.

STONE and HOGAN, JJ., concur. BILLINGS, C. J., concurs in separate opinion. FLANIGAN, J., dissents in separate opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Luebbering Oil Co. v. Ozark Truck Plaza Inc.
883 S.W.2d 558 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1994)
Corn v. Holloway
814 S.W.2d 319 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1991)
Proctor v. Director of Revenue
753 S.W.2d 69 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1988)
Montesano v. James
655 S.W.2d 137 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1983)
Stuckey v. Stuckey
628 S.W.2d 406 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1982)
Vore v. Roderick
616 S.W.2d 130 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1981)
Green v. Stanfill
612 S.W.2d 435 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1981)
Gothard v. Spradling
586 S.W.2d 443 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1979)
Dampier v. Nichols
570 S.W.2d 340 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1978)
State v. Netzer
563 S.W.2d 536 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1978)
State v. Preston
563 S.W.2d 98 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1978)
State v. Hayes
563 S.W.2d 99 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1978)
State v. Lee
562 S.W.2d 794 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
561 S.W.2d 448, 1978 Mo. App. LEXIS 1960, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gothard-v-spradling-moctapp-1978.